I was listening to the radio this morning and I heard an interview with a biomedical engineer, Dr. Mark Kroll, from California Polytechnic State University. He was attending a three day conference on sudden death and in-custody deaths with law enforcement and medical examiners given by the U.S. Institute for the Prevention of In-Custody Deaths this week.
Dr Kroll said this morning that people do not understand electricity and they do not understand how tasers work. He said tasers are safe under all circumstances – tasers do no harm!! With a understatement destined to send shivers down pop culture media watchers – he stated that tasers were safer than Tylenol. When I heard that I instantly flashed back to the Tylenol scare in the 1980s and the fact the people actually died from taking Tylenol. I wondered what he was thinking saying such a thing. Anyhow, he denied any influence from the manufacturers of tasers, that though he teaches several times a year, he is not paid by the company.
OK what is my problem. I hear the distinct voice of scientific determinism here – science is good, but we do not understand it. If we did understand tasers/science we would appreciate how useful it is. The company who makes tasers say they are harmless, police officers say they are harmless, and yet we have more than one death in context with controlled force used by law enforcement officials.
Technology is not just good and it is not always used to further the just. Studies can be used in such a way as to make things that are dangerous seem harmless – is this the case here. I think we need to insist that studies are done by people with less motivation than the manufacturers and police who make and use the technology.